Digital Activism as a New Arena of Human Rights Advocacy in Muslim Society: The #MeToo Movement in Egypt

المؤلفون

  • Novi Rizka Amalia Universitas Darussalam Gontor
  • Annisa Ramadina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19905246

الملخص

The expansion of digital technology has significantly transformed the landscape of human rights advocacy, particularly in socio-political contexts where public discourse is constrained. This study examines how digital activism constitutes a new arena of human rights advocacy within Muslim society, with a specific focus on the #MeToo movement in Egypt. While discussions on sexual violence in Egypt have historically been limited by patriarchal norms, cultural stigma, and political restrictions, digital platforms have enabled survivors to articulate their experiences and challenge dominant social narratives. Using a qualitative case study approach and the Transnational Advocacy Network (TAN) framework, this research analyses how digital activists employ strategies such as information politics, symbolic politics, leverage politics, and accountability politics in advancing gender-related human rights claims. The findings reveal that digital activism not only amplifies marginalized voices but also reconfigures the space of advocacy by transforming private experiences into collective public discourse. Importantly, the study demonstrates that digital activism in Egypt operates within a Muslim socio-religious context, where advocacy efforts are shaped by Islamic ethical principles. Activists strategically integrate values such as justice (adl), human dignity (karamah), and the protection of honor (hifz al-‘ird) to legitimize their claims and enhance social acceptance. This process reflects what the study conceptualizes as Islamic ethical adaptation, where global human rights norms are localized within religious framework.

التنزيلات

بيانات التنزيل غير متوفرة بعد.

المراجع

Abdelmonem, A. (2023). Egypt’s #MeToo in the Shadow of Revolution. The Palgrave Handbook of Gender, Media and Communication in the Middle East and North Africa, Palgrave Macmillan.

Abu-Lughod, L. (2013). Do Muslim Women Need Saving? (1st ed). Cambridge, Massachusetts : Harvard University Press.

Al-Najjar, A. (2019). #MeToo in Egypt: Challenges and Opportunities. Journal of Middle Eastern Women’s Studies, Vol. 15(No. 2).

An-Na’im, A. A. (2008). Islam and the Secular State: Negotiating the Future of Shari’a. MA: Harvard University Press.

Auda, J. (2008). Maqasid al-Shariah as Philosophy of Islamic Law. The International Institute Of Islamic Thought.

Castells, M. (2015). Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age (Issue 2). Polity Press.

Donnelly, J. (2013). Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice (Third Edit). Cornell University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7591/j.ctt1xx5q2

Engle Merry, S. (2006). Transnational Human Rights and Local Activism : American Anthropologist, 108(1), 38–51.

Hallaq, W. B. (2009). Shari‘a: Theory, Practice, Transformations. Cambridge University Press.

Hashemi, N. (2009). Islam, Secularism, and Liberal Democracy. Oxford University Press.

Howard, P. N., & Hussain, M. M. (2013). Democracy’s Fourth Wave? Digital Media and the Arab Spring. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199936953.001.0001

Human Rights Watch. (2023). Events of 2022. https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2023/country-chapters/egypt#:~:text=Judges and prosecutors routinely remanded,pretrial detention in Egyptian law.

Kamali, M. H. (2008). Shari‘ah Law: An Introduction. Oneworld Publications.

Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Cornell University Press.

Mahmood, S. (2011). Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject. Princeton University Press.

التنزيلات

منشور

2026-04-30

كيفية الاقتباس

Novi Rizka Amalia, و Annisa Ramadina. 2026. "Digital Activism As a New Arena of Human Rights Advocacy in Muslim Society: The #MeToo Movement in Egypt". Jisiera: The Journal of Islamic Studies and International Relations 9 (1):1-24. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19905246.