The Effectiveness of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) as a Global Security Institution in the Resolution of the M/V Saiga Dispute (1997-1999)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23620922Keywords:
ITLOS, institutional effectiveness, maritime disputes, M/V Saiga, Neoliberal InstitutionalismAbstract
This study analyzes the effectiveness of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) as an international institution for the peaceful settlement of maritime disputes through the M/V Saiga case (Saint Vincent and the Grenadines v. Guinea, 1997–1999). Using a qualitative case-study method, it examines primary legal materials, including the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) and the two distinct ITLOS proceedings: the 1997 prompt-release case (Case No. 1) and the 1999 merits case (Case No. 2). Guided by Robert O. Keohane’s Neoliberal Institutionalism, the analysis applies four indicators: dispute resolution, prevention of conflict escalation, clarification and application of international law of the sea, and state compliance with tribunal rulings. The 1997 judgment ordered the prompt release of the vessel and its crew upon the provision of a bond, while the 1999 judgment examined the merits of the dispute, including the legality of Guinea’s conduct under UNCLOS and compensation. Taken together, the proceedings illustrate the value and limits of judicial dispute settlement: ITLOS can clarify legal obligations and provide binding remedies, but effectiveness also depends on implementation. The Bangladesh/Myanmar maritime-boundary case (2012) is used as a brief comparison, not as a substitute for analysis of both M/V Saiga proceedings.
Downloads
References
International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. (2013). Affaire de l’« Arctic Sunrise » (Royaume des Pays-Bas c. Fédération de Russie): Pleadings, minutes of public sittings and documents (Vol. 20, pp. 105–142). Brill | Nijhoff. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004272484_004
Arif, Md. K. H. (2018). Bangladesh-Myanmar Maritime Boundary Delimitation in the Bay of Bengal: An Analysis on the Development of International Law. Kathmandu School of Law Review, 53–64. https://doi.org/10.46985/jms.v6i2.210
Bueger, C. (2015). What is maritime security? Marine Policy, 53, 159–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2014.12.005 Chimni, B. S. (n.d.). International Institutions Today: An Imperial Global State in the Making.
Churchill, R. (2025). Adjudicating the Law of the Sea. The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 40(4), 766–774. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718085-bja10267
Guinea. (1997). Counter-memorial submitted by Guinea in the M/V “Saiga” (No. 1) case. International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. [Verify exact document title and document-specific URL against the official case record.]
Ding, Z. (2024). Maritime Disputes from a Global Perspective and Solutions under International Law. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, 66(1), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/66/2024MU0013
Gupta, A. (2022). The ITLOS and the resolution of maritime boundary dispute between Bangladesh and Myanmar: Lessons for pending maritime disputes. [Publication details, journal/publisher, page range, and DOI/URL require verification against the original publication.]
International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. (2001a). Pleadings, minutes of public sittings and documents / Mémoires, procès-verbaux
des audiences publiques et documents (Vol. 1: 1997). Brill | Nijhoff. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004195264
International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. (2001b). [Verify whether this is a duplicate of the 2001a volume or a distinct document; provide exact title and source.]
Petrig, A., & Bo, M. (2019). The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea and Human Rights. In M. Scheinin (Ed.), Human Rights Norms in ‘Other’ International Courts (1st ed., pp. 353–411). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108584623.012
Richardson, J. L. (2009). The Ethics of Neoliberal Institutionalism. In C. Reus-Smit & D. Snidal (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Relations (1st ed., pp. 222–233). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199219322.003.0012 M/V “Saiga” (Saint Vincent and the Grenadines v. Guinea), Case No. 2, Judgment (1 July 1999). International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. https://www.itlos.org/en/main/cases/list-of-cases/case-no-2/ Cases and official legal documents
ITLOS. (1997). Hearings concluded in the M/V “Saiga” case: Judgment orders prompt release (Press Release No. 10). International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. https://www.itlos.org/en/main/cases/list-of-cases/case-no-1/
ITLOS. (2016a). International Tribunal for the Law Oof the See. ITLOS Press Office. file:///D:/Downloads/TUGASSS/MV%20SAIGA/DATA/1605-22023_Itlos_Selbstd_En.pdf
ITLOS. (2016b). The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (D. Bockwoldt, H. G. Esch, E. Getzieh, A. Laible, & M. Rauhe, Eds.). International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. https://www.itlos.org/
Klerk, B. E. (2025). The ITLOS advisory opinion on climate change: Revisiting the relationship between the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and the Paris Agreement. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 34(1), 181–193. https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12588 M/V “Saiga” (Saint Vincent and the Grenadines v. Guinea), Case No. 1, Judgment (4 December 1997). International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. https://www.itlos.org/en/main/cases/list-of-cases/case-no-1/
Park, C.-H., Choon-Ho, N., Nelson, L. D., L. DChandrasekhara Raoolliver, P., Vukas, B., & Ndiaye, T. M. (1997). Opinion of Judges Park, Nelson, Chandrasekhara Rao, Vukas et Ndiaye. International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. https://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/cases/1/C1_Minutes.pdf?utm_source
United Nations. (1982, December 10). United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. https://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/unclos_e.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jisiera: The Journal of Islamic Studies and International Relations
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright holder of all articles belongs to The Journal of Islamic Studies and International Relations. Under CC Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0, readers are free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially).
