The Hollow Umma: A Socio-Epistemic Critique of Mandaville’s Transnational Politics in the Age of Algorithms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19908873الكلمات المفتاحية:
Digital Taqlid، Hollow Umma، Algorithmic Authority، Cognitive Offloading، Socio-Epistemologyالملخص
This study challenges the techno-optimist narrative regarding the transnational Muslim community by critically revisiting Peter Mandaville’s theory of Travelling Islam through a socio-epistemic lens. While early scholarship envisioned digital connectivity as a mechanism for the creative reimagining of the Umma, this research argues that the digital medium has engineered a condition identified as the Hollow Umma. Rather than facilitating a genuine democratization of knowledge, the digital sphere triggers a radical epistemological deregulation that actively replaces traditional Islamic meritocracy—anchored in scholarly lineage (Sanad) and qualified expertise (Ahl al-Dhikr)—with a democratic logic of quantity and virality. Furthermore, driven by the epistemic habits of Generation Z and their active reliance on social media as primary search engines, the locus of religious authority has drastically shifted from classical Ulama to "religious micro-celebrities." Drawing upon Khaled Abou El Fadl’s framework, the paper demonstrates how this socio-epistemic inversion empowers an authoritarian discourse based on digital popularity over authoritative, self-limiting scholarship. By synthesizing Heidegger’s philosophy of technology with Zuboff’s concept of instrumentarian power, the article diagnoses the emergence of Digital Taqlid—a pathological state where believers surrender intellectual sovereignty to algorithmic authority. Ultimately, the paper concludes that without a deliberate reclamation of epistemic agency via Digital Tahqiq, the transnational Umma risks being reduced to a simulacrum of solidarity governed by emotional capitalism
التنزيلات
المراجع
Abusharif, I. N. (2019). Cyber-Islamic Environments and Salafī-Ṣūfī Contestations Appropriating Digital Media and Challenges to Religious Authority [Doctoral, University of Wales Trinity Saint David]. https://repository.uwtsd.ac.uk/id/eprint/1196/
Addzaky, K. U., Hasanah, U., & Syarif Zain, Z. F. (2024). Developing Wasathiyah Epistemology: A Literature-Based Study of Moderate Islamic Knowledge in The Post-Truth Era. HEUTAGOGIA: Journal of Islamic Education, 4(2), 199–217. https://doi.org/10.14421/hjie.2024.42-05
Afidah, I., Kurniati, N., Nasir, M. A., & Muttaqin, A. (2024). Religious Micro-celebrity: Young Preachers’ Self-Presentation in Digital Sphere. Alhadharah: Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah, 23(2), 227–245. https://doi.org/10.18592/alhadharah.v23i2.13680
Allievi, S., & Nielsen, J. S. (Eds.). (2010). Muslim networks and transnational communities in and across Europe. Brill.
Amin, M. H. I., Haidira, K., & Asniah. (2025). The Phenomenon of Muslim Influencers and Qur’anic Interpreters in
the Digital Space: A Study of Ismail Al-Ascholy’s Interactions on the Instagram Account @ismailascholy. Al-
Fahmu: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir, 4(2), 367–389. https://doi.org/10.58363/alfahmu.v4i2.498
Anam, R. K. (2025a). Against Algorithmic Authority: Al-Ghazali, Digital Taqlid, and the Crisis of Epistemic Agency in the Age of AI. Journal of Islamic Philosophy and Contemporary Thought, 3(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.15642/jipct.2025.3.1.1-35
Anam, R. K. (2025b). Filsafat Teknologi Martin Heidegger Membongkar Gestell, Menemukan Ereignis. EL-MARKAZI. https://elmarkazistore.com/filsafat-teknologi-martin-heidegger-membongkar-gestell-menemukan-ereignis/
Aradau, C., & Huysmans, J. (2014). Critical methods in International Relations: The politics of techniques, devices and acts. European Journal of International Relations, 20(3), 596–619. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066112474479
Baidawi, B. (2025). Shaping Virtual Religious Authority: The Power of Digital Media on Micro-Celebrity Da’i. Journal of Asian Wisdom and Islamic Behavior, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.59371/jawab.v3i1.93
Berger, A., & Golan, O. (2024). Online religious learning: Digital epistemic authority and self-socialization in religious communities. Learning, Media and Technology, 49(2), 274–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2023.2169833
Campbell, H. A., & Evolvi, G. (2020). Contextualizing current digital religion research on emerging technologies. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.149
Dimopoulos, K., & Koulaidis, V. (2002). The socio-epistemic constitution of science and technology in the Greek press: An analysis of its presentation. Public Understanding of Science, 11(3), 225–241. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/11/3/302
Dreyfus, H. L., & Spinosa, C. (2003). Further Reflections on Heidegger, Technology, and the Everyday. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 23(5), 339–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467603259868
El Naggar, S. (2024). Muslim Identities in Contemporary Televangelists’ Online Discourse. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-67994-0
Ezzat, H. R. (2011). The Umma: From Global Civil Society to Global Public Sphere. In D. Kostovicova & M. Glasius
(Eds.), Bottom-Up Politics (pp. 40–49). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230357075_3
Fadl, K. A. E. (2001). And God Knows the Soldiers: The Authoritative and Authoritarian in Islamic Discourses. Rowman and Littlefield Publishing.
Fail, Moh. (2022). Fenomena Taqlid Digital dan Implikasinya dalam Bertauhid di Era Post Truth. Journal of Islamic Thought and Philosophy, 1(1), 27–49. https://doi.org/10.15642/jitp.2022.1.1.27-49
Goh, I. (Ed.). (2019). French Thought and Literary Theory in the UK (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367809287
Han, B.-C. (2017). Psychopolitics: Neoliberalism and new technologies of power (E. Butler, Tran.). Verso.
Hefner, R. W., & Zaman, M. Q. (Eds.). (2010). Schooling Islam: The culture and politics of modern Muslim education. Princeton University Press.
Hemming, L. P., Costea, B., & Amiridis, K. (2011). The movement of nihilism: Heidegger’s thinking after Nietzsche. Continuum.
Ho, W.-Y. (2010). Islam, China and the Internet: Negotiating Residual Cyberspace between Hegemonic Patriotism and Connectivity to the Ummah. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 30(1), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602001003650622
Ibragimova, R. S.-, & Beloglazova, I. (2021). What Do Sheikh-Google And Facebook-Mufti Preach? (Theological Issues in the Muslim Blogosphere and Mobile Apps). International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 9, 1761–1766. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.201
Khasri, M. R. K. (2020). The Role of Subject in Kuntowijoyo’s Transformative Thought and It’s Relevance to The Islamic Social Transformation. Jurnal Filsafat, 30(2), 261. https://doi.org/10.22146/jf.54911
Laor, T. (2024). Do micro-celebrities preserve social roles? Differences between secular and religious female Instagram lifestyle influencers. Technology in Society, 78, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102642
Lewis, J. R. (Ed.). (2017). The Cambridge companion to religion and terrorism. Cambridge University Press.
Mandaville, P. (1999). Reimagining the Umma: Transnational spaces and the changing boundaries of Muslim political community.
Mandaville, P. (2001). Reimagining Islam in Diaspora: The Politics of Mediated Community. Gazette (Leiden, Netherlands), 63(2–3), 169–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016549201063002005
Mandaville, P. (2007). Globalization and the Politics of Religious Knowledge: Pluralizing Authority in the Muslim World. Theory, Culture & Society, 24(2), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276407074998
Mandaville, P. (2010). Global Political Islam (0 ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203358511
Mandaville, P. (2011). Transnational Muslim solidarities and everyday life: Transnational Muslim solidarities and everyday life. Nations and Nationalism, 17(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8129.2010.00459.x
Mandaville, P. (2013). 1 Reimagining the Ummah? Information technology and the changing boundaries of political Islam. In Political Islam (pp. 347–370). Routledge.
Mandaville, P. (2020). Islam and politics. Routledge.
Mandaville, P. (2026). Reimagining Islam in Diaspora. In A. Piela, Islam and the Media (1st ed., pp. 219–238). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003763666-12
Mandaville, P. G. (1998). Reimagining the Umma: Translocal space and the changing boundaries of Muslim political community. University of Kent (United Kingdom).
Mandaville, P. G. (1999). Territory and Translocality: Discrepant Idioms of Political Identity. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 28(3), 653–673. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298990280030201
Mandaville, P. G. (2003). Transnational Muslim politics: Reimagining the umma. Routledge.
Mandaville, P., & Williams, A. (2015). Meaning and International Relations (P. Mandaville & A. Williams, Eds.; 1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203167557
McClure, P. K. (2017). Tinkering with Technology and Religion in the Digital Age: The Effects of Internet Use on Religious Belief, Behavior, and Belonging. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 56(3), 481–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.12365
Morris, D. (2024). Magical thinking and the test of humanity: We have seen the danger of AI and it is us. AI & SOCIETY, 39(6), 3047–3049. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01775-1
Muthohirin, N. (2025). Faith in the Digital Age: The Rise of Islamic Fundamentalism and the Plurality of Young Muslims’ Piety on Social Media. Islamica: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 19(2), 199–233.
https://doi.org/10.15642/islamica.2025.19.2.199-233
Neuberger, C., Bartsch, A., Fröhlich, R., Hanitzsch, T., Reinemann, C., & Schindler, J. (2023). The digital transformation of knowledge order: A model for the analysis of the epistemic crisis. Annals of the International Communication Association, 47(2), 180–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2023.2169950
Nowicka, M. (2015). Traveling Theory: The Legacy of Edward W. Said in Eastern Europe. http://dspace.uni.lodz.pl:8080/xmlui/handle/11089/20314
Nurul Hakim. (2025). Hoaxes on Social Media in the Perspective of Hadith. International Journal of Islamic Studies Issues, 1(2), 41–46. https://doi.org/10.59966/y4rbay28
Primig, F. (2025). The epistemic crisis and the rise of the far right: Toward a conceptualization of counter-knowledge orders in digital knowledge society. Publizistik, 70(1–2), 23–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-025-00887-6
Rae, G. (2012). Being and Technology: Heidegger on the Overcoming of Metaphysics. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 43(3), 305–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071773.2012.11006778
Rojek, C., Turner, P. B. S., & Turner, B. (Eds.). (2002). Forget Baudrillard? (0 ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203412886
Samson, J. (1989). White Lies: Melville’s Narratives of Facts. Cornell University Press.
Saputra, R., & Islamiyah, U. H. (2019). Da’wah Strategy through Google Search Engine Optimization. Islam Universalia: International Journal of Islamic Studies and Social Sciences, 1(1), 19–41. https://doi.org/10.56613/islam-universalia.v1i1.111
Seitakhmetova, N., & Zhandossova, S. (2025). THE INFLUENCE OF DIGITALIZATION ON RELIGIOUS IDENTITY: SOCIO-POLITICAL CONTEXT. Eurasian Research Journal, 7(1), 61–71. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/erj/article/1631058
Shani, G. (2008). Toward a Post-Western IR: The Umma , Khalsa Panth , and Critical International Relations Theory1. International Studies Review, 10(4), 722–734. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2486.2008.00828.x
Sherman, A., & Morrissey, C. (2017). What Is Art Good For? The Socio-Epistemic Value of Art. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, 411. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00411
Stiegler, B. (2010). For a new critique of political economy (D. Ross, Ed.). Polity.
Sulfikar, A., & Yasmine, D. I. (2026). PLATFORMIZED RELIGIOUS AUTHORITY: Rethinking Legitimacy in the Age of Social Media Influencers. Epistemé: Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu Keislaman, 20(02), 141–171. https://doi.org/10.21274/epis.2025.20.02.141-171
Van Den Heever, G. (2022). Travelling Theories. Religion and Theology, 29(3–4), 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1163/15743012-02903001
Vasilaki, R. (2012). Provincialising IR? Deadlocks and Prospects in Post-Western IR Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 41(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829812451720
Whyte, S. A. (2022). Islamic religious authority in cyberspace: A qualitative study of Muslim religious actors in Australia. Religions, 13(1), 69.
Zaluchu, S. E. (2024). Digital Religion, Modern Society and the Construction of Digital Theology. Transformation: An International Journal of Holistic Mission Studies, 41(4), 285–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/02653788231223929
Zeiny, E. (2025). Coloniality, Socio‐Epistemic Vices and the Question of Knowledge in Iran. Sociology Compass, 19(2), e70040. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.70040
Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. Profile books.
روحانی, ح. (2022). Soren Kierkegaards Leap of Faith: Political implications. مجله پژوهش های فلسفی, 16(41). https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2022.53176.3353
التنزيلات
منشور
كيفية الاقتباس
إصدار
القسم
الرخصة
الحقوق الفكرية (c) 2026 Jisiera: The Journal of Islamic Studies and International Relations
هذا العمل مرخص بموجب Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright holder of all articles belongs to The Journal of Islamic Studies and International Relations. Under CC Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0, readers are free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially).
